1997 MCC Smart vs. 1963 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Toyota Corona. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1963 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Toyota Corona weights approximately 290 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1963 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart | Corona |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 38 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
