1997 MCC Smart vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (89 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | MCC | Triumph |
Model | Smart | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |