1997 MCC Smart vs. 1981 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Renault Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1981 Renault Rodeo. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Renault Rodeo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1981 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | MCC | Renault |
| Model | Smart | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 35 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
