1997 MCC Smart vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (74 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 255 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Smart | Colt |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1600 mm |
