1997 MCC Smart vs. 1992 Rover 400
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Rover 400 (86 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 400 weights approximately 526 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1992 Rover 400 | |
| Make | MCC | Rover |
| Model | Smart | 400 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 86 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1176 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1690 mm |
