1997 MCC Smart vs. 1994 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Plymouth Voyager (100 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Voyager should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 755 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1994 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | MCC | Plymouth |
Model | Smart | Voyager |
Year Released | 1997 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1840 mm |