1997 MCC Smart vs. 1995 Rover 416i
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 416i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 416i would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 416i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 416i (110 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 416i should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 416i weights approximately 485 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 416i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1995 Rover 416i | |
Make | MCC | Rover |
Model | Smart | 416i |
Year Released | 1997 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 110 HP |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |