1998 Audi A6 vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
Make | Audi | Humber |
Model | A6 | Hawk |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2225 cc | 2265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 72 L |