1998 Audi AD vs. 1982 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Fairlane (296 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD. 1982 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 1998 Audi AD has manual transmission. 1998 Audi AD will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1982 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | AD | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |