1998 Audi AD vs. 2009 BMW 520
To start off, 2009 BMW 520 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 520 (350 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 2009 BMW 520 | |
| Make | Audi | BMW |
| Model | AD | 520 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
