1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Honda Mobilio
To start off, 2003 Honda Mobilio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (160 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2003 Honda Mobilio. (108 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Mobilio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 153 kg more than 2003 Honda Mobilio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Mobilio. (143 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Mobilio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Honda Mobilio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | Mobilio |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3349 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1750 mm |