1998 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1077 kg more than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Daewoo Matiz | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Daewoo | Dodge |
Model | Matiz | Ram |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 853 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 76 L |