1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 1981 Peugeot 305

To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Peugeot 305 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Peugeot 305 (64 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Peugeot 305 should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Peugeot 305 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Peugeot 305 (94 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1981 Peugeot 305 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.

Compare all specifications:

1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe 1981 Peugeot 305
Make MCC Peugeot
Model Smart & Pulse City Coupe 305
Year Released 1998 1981
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 599 cc 1290 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 53 HP 64 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 80 Nm 94 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 63.5 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 63 mm 67.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 720 kg 920 kg
Vehicle Length 2510 mm 4250 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 1820 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 22 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]