1998 Panoz Q9 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Volkswagen Golf is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Golf will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Golf. (320 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Golf. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 2006 Volkswagen Golf has manual transmission. 2006 Volkswagen Golf will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Panoz Q9 | 2006 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Panoz | Volkswagen |
| Model | Q9 | Golf |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 248 HP |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
