1998 Peugeot Tulip vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Peugeot Tulip would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (205 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Peugeot Tulip | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Peugeot | Toyota |
| Model | Tulip | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 205 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3270 mm |
