1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Plymouth | Ford |
| Model | Pronto Cruiser | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2300 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3193 mm |
