1998 Renault Clio vs. 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur
To start off, 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher.
Because 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur | |
Make | Renault | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Clio | Silver Spur |
Year Released | 1998 | 1999 |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 108 L |