1998 Renault Clio vs. 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara (105 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 427 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara (145 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Renault | Suzuki |
Model | Clio | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 83 mm |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 14.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1407 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3865 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |