1999 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001
To start off, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1999 AC Aceca. (346 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 1999 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 410 kg more than 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | |
| Make | AC | Bizzarrini |
| Model | Aceca | BZ-2001 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 6900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 500 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2560 mm |
