1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 229 more horse power than 1999 Dodge Charger. (321 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Charger | R 390 GT1 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 550 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2720 mm |
