1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford 021 C weights approximately 28 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.

Because 1980 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (170 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford 021 C 1980 Nissan Bluebird
Make Ford Nissan
Model 021 C Bluebird
Year Released 1999 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 2393 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 170 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1298 kg 1270 kg
Vehicle Length 3610 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 2530 mm