1999 Ford 021 C vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford 021 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford 021 C would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 107 kg more than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK (310 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 021 C | SLK |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 310 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |