1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP) has 243 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1225 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Econoline | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6801 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 2415 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |
