1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 2012 Audi TT | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Econoline | TT |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Van | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6801 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2469 mm |
