1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1958 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jaguar XK weights approximately 268 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jaguar XK (310 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 1958 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1958 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Mustang | XK |
Year Released | 1999 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 310 Nm |
Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 90 L |