1999 Ford Puma vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Puma would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1999 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Puma.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Puma. (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Puma | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Puma | Raider |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 83 L |
