1999 Holden Maloo vs. 2011 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2011 Pagani Zonda is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Pagani Zonda (759 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Maloo. (542 Nm). This means 2011 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Maloo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 2011 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Holden | Pagani |
| Model | Maloo | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 547 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 759 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
