1999 Lada Samara II vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1999 Lada Samara II. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1999 Lada Samara II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lada Samara II. (110 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Lada Samara II | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Lada | Holden |
| Model | Samara II | Epica |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
