1999 Mazda 626 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda 626 (114 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 626 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda 626 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 626 | Smart |
Year Released | 1999 | 1997 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |