1999 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2010 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 5 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chrysler Sebring. (220 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | 2010 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chrysler |
| Model | SUW | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1099 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1910 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 64 L |
