1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan C 52 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | C 52 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 148 HP |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2640 mm |
