1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi A3 weights approximately 194 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan C 52 | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | C 52 | A3 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 354 Nm | 280 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1460 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2578 mm |