2000 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Chrysler TC
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler TC. (175 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 134 kg more than 1992 Chrysler TC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1992 Chrysler TC | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Aceca | TC |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2370 mm |