2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1963 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 433 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1225 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (582 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Cadillac Sixty.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1963 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Rosemeyer | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 1032 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3300 mm |
