2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 2006 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2006 Mercury Mariner is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi Rosemeyer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi Rosemeyer would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 429 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (201 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 671 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 770 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (262 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 2006 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | Rosemeyer | Mariner |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 262 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1571 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2630 mm |