2000 Audi TT vs. 1983 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1983 Dodge Charger. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge Charger. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1983 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | TT | Charger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 161 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2460 mm |