2000 BMW 528 vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 528. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 528 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2013 Ford F-150. (298 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 455 kg more than 2000 BMW 528.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford F-150 (377 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 528. (279 Nm). This means 2013 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 528 | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 528 | F-150 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 377 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2464 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3200 mm |