2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1955 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1955 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Citroen 2CV. (25 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1955 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | Z9 | 2CV |
Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 12 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 25 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 62 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2410 mm |