2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 940 kg more than 1964 Steyr Haflinger.
Because 1964 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 Steyr Haflinger | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Steyr |
| Model | Camaro | Haflinger |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 2840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1360 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1510 mm |
