2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1964 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1964 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | Taunus |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2530 mm |
