2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Corona. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Corona. (68 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Tracker | Corona |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
