2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1984 Honda Civic
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Honda Civic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Honda Civic would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Honda Civic (100 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Honda Civic. (130 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1984 Honda Civic | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Tracker | Civic |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2460 mm |