2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | E-250 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 389 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3510 mm |
