2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | ESX 3 | Renown |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2750 mm |
