2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1977 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1977 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1977 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1977 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1977 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1977 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | ESX 3 | 240 C |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2700 mm |