2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1992 Rover 100
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Rover 100 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Rover 100 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1992 Rover 100.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1992 Rover 100 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rover |
| Model | ESX 3 | 100 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
