2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 868 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | ESX 3 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3510 mm |
