2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Howler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Howler would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Howler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 305 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Howler.
Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Howler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Howler (408 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 SsangYong Musso. (306 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler Howler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Howler | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
| Model | Howler | Musso |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 306 Nm |
| Top Speed | 207 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 80 L |
