2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2006 Audi TT
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 2006 Audi TT | |
| Make | Chrysler | Audi |
| Model | Java | TT |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 3189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1360 mm |
