2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC60 (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Java | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1712 mm |
